GlobalRAWS

global recruitment and workforce solutions

Your Global Workforce Partner, Committed to Your Success

Partners

0 +

Employers

0 +

Registered Candidates

0 +

🇧🇩

হ্যালো Bangla

🇺🇸

HELLO! English

🇨🇳

你好！ Chinese

🇦🇪

مرحباً Arabic

🇪🇸

¡HOLA! Spanish

🇫🇷

BONJOUR! French

🇩🇪

HALLO! German

🇯🇵

こんにちは! Japanese

🇰🇷

안녕하세요 Korean

🇵🇹

OLÁ! Portuguese

GlobalRAWS is good company to work as business partner. Their communication is clear, payment discussion is proper, and team follow the work regularly. Sometimes confirmation takes little more time, but they always reply and complete the matter. We have positive working experience.

We received helpful recruitment support from GlobalRAWS. They understood our requirement and shared candidate information in organized way, so our work became easier.

My experience with GlobalRAWS team was good. They communicate respectfully and give support when business work or office coordination is needed.

Good service and easy communication. They helped me to find suitable candidates for my shop.

I needed people for site work and GlobalRAWS supported the recruitment process. They listened to job requirement, gave suitable profiles, and helped with interview arrangement. First response was little slow, but after that communication was regular. Overall good service.

They help me well. They check my profile. They explain the process. They give me update. I am happy with service.

Good service for me.

This agency helped me for New York construction job. They explained the job and interview steps in simple way. I got good support from the team.

We asked for different worker categories and GlobalRAWS handled the request in organized way. Communication was easy, candidate information was clear, and follow-up was regular. One or two documents needed correction, but team fixed it quickly.

Professional team and easy communication. Candidate information was well organized, interview support was good, and follow-up was regular. The first shortlist was not fully matching, but the second list was much better.